Justice Department boosts activity to police the police
By Jerry Markon,
The Obama administration is ramping up civil rights enforcement
against local police nationwide, opening a number of investigations to
determine whether officers are guilty of brutality or discrimination
against Hispanics and other minorities.
In recent months, the Justice Department has begun inquiries into major city police departments such as Portland, Ore., where officers shot several people who had mental health issues, and Seattle, where police were accused of gunning down a homeless Native American woodcarver. The department issued a scathing report earlier this month accusing Puerto Rico police of a “staggering level of crime and corruption.’’
All
told, Justice’s Civil Rights Division is conducting 17 probes of police
and sheriff departments — the largest number in its 54-year history.
The investigations are civil, meaning they will not lead to criminal
charges, but can result in court-enforced reforms.
The federal effort, part of the administration’s heightened enforcement of civil rights laws, has won praise from advocacy groups and experts on police brutality.
“This
is long overdue,’’ said Deborah J. Vagins, senior legislative counsel
for the ACLU’s Washington legislative office. “The Bush administration
beyond dropped the ball. These are some of the most egregious
situations, places where we have killings committed by officers.’’
While
many localities have welcomed the federal inquiries, others complain
they are duplicating the work of civilian review boards, and can end up
costing the jurisdictions millions of dollars if monitoring is ordered.
Two of the departments under review have resisted, forcing the
government to sue to gain access to documents or to interview deputies.
Among those is Maricopa County, Ariz., led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose department is under investigation for allegedly discriminating against Hispanic inmates and motorists.
The
sheriff’s office in Alamance County, N.C., is still battling the
Justice Department in court and has accused it of having political
motives. “We have no idea what the allegations are because they won’t
tell us,’’ said Randy Jones, a sheriff’s office spokesman. “They need to
be upfront and professional, and we haven’t seen that . . . it seems like they’re trying to find something, and there’s nothing there.’’
Justice
officials, who have said they are exploring whether Alamance deputies
discriminated against Hispanics, say police investigations are a key
part of their effort to revitalize the Civil Rights Division. It had
suffered a mass exodus of lawyers amid conclusions by internal watchdogs that hiring was politicized in the Bush administration.
Thomas E. Perez,
assistant attorney general for civil rights, said the investigations
into local police are “really a cornerstone of our work.” He was
speaking to reporters about the report on Puerto Rico, which accused
officers of widespread brutality, unconstitutional arrests and targeting
people of Dominican descent.
That followed a Justice Department
report in March that said the New Orleans Police Department repeatedly
violated constitutional rights by using excessive force, illegally
arresting people and targeting black and gay residents.
“When
police officers cross the line, they need to be held accountable,’’
Perez said. “Criminal prosecutions alone will not change the culture of a
department.’’
Experts say it is unclear if police brutality is
increasing or just more likely to be exposed, though Justice officials
say factors such as the economy and weaknesses in the mental health
system are leading to more potentially dangerous encounters with
civilians.
“There’s no way to measure it,’’ said Samuel Walker, an
expert on police accountability at the University of Nebraska at Omaha,
who praised the Obama administration’s crackdown as “a simple issue of
justice. The victims are almost entirely people of color.’’
The
current investigations cite a 1994 federal law that gave the Civil
Rights Division the authority to determine whether departments are
engaging in a “pattern or practice” of violating constitutional or
federal rights. It was enacted after the videotaped beating of black motorist Rodney King by Los Angeles police officers.
The
Obama administration also has amped up criminal enforcement. The Civil
Rights Division last year filed a record number of criminal cases, 52,
against mostly law enforcement officers for allegedly violating
constitutional or legal rights “under color of law.’’ There are about
10,000 police departments nationwide.
In the civil probes, lawyers
in the division’s Special Litigation Section track potential cases
through media reports and by consulting with officers, advocacy groups
and citizens. Justice Department officials are focusing on large
departments and on securing court-enforced changes to guarantee enduring
reforms.
“We can’t go everywhere there is a civil rights
violation,’’ said one Justice official, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity because he was not an authorized spokesman. “There are too
many places with problems.’’
Among the most expansive probes is in Newark, where the Justice Department announced in May it
is investigating allegations including excessive force and
discriminatory policing. The ACLU had called for a probe and issued a
report documenting 407 alleged cases of police misconduct.
In
Suffolk County, N.Y., investigators are probing whether police failed to
respond to 911 calls from Hispanics and other non-English speakers. The
probe in Portland, launched in June, focuses on allegations of
excessive force, especially against people with mental health issues.
Last
month, the department announced it would investigate whether Los Angles
County sheriff’s deputies in two cities conspired with housing
officials to discriminate against black families with low-income housing
vouchers.
Steve Whitmore, a spokesman for the county sheriff’s
department, said Justice lawyers did not consult with an independent
review board probing similar allegations. He said Sheriff Leroy D. Baca
would cooperate, yet questioned whether another investigation is needed
“when you have several lawyers of oversight already and budgets are
extraordinarily tight.’’
Xochitl Hinojosa, a Justice Department
spokeswoman, said the department “strongly supports civilian oversight
and internal mechanisms to independently investigate and remedy
constitutional violations.’’ She added that in cases “where internal
review or civilian oversight has failed to identify and correct a
problem, a civil rights investigation may be necessary.”
Robert
McNeilly, who was police chief in Pittsburgh during a five-year
court-approved monitoring period after a Justice Department probe, said
“there is some unnecessary alarm about these investigations.’’
“There is no doubt it was an enormous help because dramatic
change happened so quickly,’’ said McNeilly, whose former department was
accused of excessive force and other violations and released from
monitoring in 2002.
“It changed the culture of the entire organization,’’ he said. “We became more accountable.’’
Comments
Post a Comment
You are welcome to email your tips, corrections and/or comments to: aidcommission@gmail.com please indicate if you wish to remain anonymous or otherwise. We will post your comment without edit.