******* LEGACY LINK/READ ABOUT: Little Rock's Newest Corrupt Police Chief Kenton Buckner *******

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Pat Buchanan: Racial Diversity="End of White America"

MSNBC pays Pat Buchanan to broadcast white supremacist ideology to millions
Tell MSNBC to fire Pat Buchanan
This weekend, Buchanan went on white supremacist radio to promote his new book
Tell MSNBC to fire Pat Buchanan now:
Join Us
For years, Pat Buchanan has passed off white supremacist ideology as legitimate mainstream political commentary. And MSNBC continues to pay him and give him a platform on national TV to do it.
Buchanan has just published a book which says that increasing racial diversity is a threat to this country and will mean the "End of White America."1  This weekend, to promote his book, he went on a white supremacist radio show whose host has said things like "MLK's dream is our nightmare," and "interracial sex is white genocide."2
Buchanan has the right to express his views, but he's not entitled to a platform that lets him broadcast bigotry and hate to millions. If MSNBC wants to be seen as a trusted, mainstream source of news and commentary, it needs to fire Buchanan now.
Please join us in calling on MSNBC to fire Pat Buchanan:
Here are a few examples of what Buchanan has said in the past:
  • "This has been a country built basically by white folks ... "3
  • "Sonia Sotomayor does believe in race-based justice basically at the expense of white males and to advance people of color. The truth is that's what Barack Obama believes as well."4
  • "America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known … no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ’60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream."5
  • "[Former KKK Grand Wizard] David Duke is busy stealing from me. I have a mind to go down there and sue that dude for intellectual property theft."6

These are just a few of many, many examples of Buchanan's barely-disguised bigotry.7,8Buchanan has defended Hitler.9 He's said that "in a way, both sides were right" during the civil war.10 Buchanan often implies that white people are more intelligent than people of color, and just this weekend (in a different radio interview), he refused to disavow the idea that white people have superior genes.11
In general, Buchanan is pushing a vision of America that portrays white people and "white culture" as genuinely American, and diversity and multiculturalism as a threat to America. Buchanan tries to blame the country's economic problems on programs like affirmative action, welfare, and food stamps — programs which help vulnerable and disadvantaged Americans of every race, but which Buchanan and others on the far right have portrayed as only helping lazy and undeserving minorities. He takes every opportunity to stoke the racial anxiety and fear that exists among some white people. In short, Buchanan wants to pit white people against people of color. He believes in it, he thinks it's good political strategy, and in his new book he encourages the GOP to become "the white party."
If Buchanan didn't have a powerful media platform, he'd be just another person with outdated, extremist ideas. But it's irresponsible and dangerous for MSNBC to promote his hateful views to an audience of millions.
Please join us in calling on MSNBC to fire Pat Buchanan immediately:
Thanks and Peace,
-- Rashad, James, Gabriel, Dani, Matt, Natasha and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team
   October 25th, 2011

Monday, October 24, 2011

Jahessye Shockley:***Endangered***

Originally Published on October 13, 2011

Jahessye Shockley
Case Type: Endangered
DOB: Apr 01, 2006
Missing Date: Oct 11, 2011
Age Now: 5
Missing City: Glendale
Missing State: AZ
Gender: Female
Race: Black
Complexion: Medium
Height: 3-5
Weight: 55
Hair Color: Black
Hair Length: Medium
Eye Color: Brown
Wear Glasses or Contacts: No
Location Last Seen: While in the care of siblings, Jahessye wandered away and may have left through the front door of the family’s apartment on 43rd Avenue.
Circumstances of Disappearance: Shockley was last seen being picked up about 4:20 p.m. Tuesday by a black female in a black Chevrolet Malibu in the area of 45th and Glendale avenues. Glendale police said a 25- to 35-year-old African-American woman driving a 1998-2000 Chevrolet Malibu was seen in the area with a child fitting the description of Shockley.
Last Seen Wearing: Last seen wearing a white t-shirt, blue jeans shorts, and pink sandals.
Identifying Marks or Characteristics: Unknown
Have information about Jahessye? Click here to submit information to the Black and Missing Tip Line!

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Justice Department boosts activity to police the police

Justice Department boosts activity to police the police

By , Washington Post Published: September 17

The Obama administration is ramping up civil rights enforcement against local police nationwide, opening a number of investigations to determine whether officers are guilty of brutality or discrimination against Hispanics and other minorities.

In recent months, the Justice Department has begun inquiries into major city police departments such as Portland, Ore., where officers shot several people who had mental health issues, and Seattle, where police were accused of gunning down a homeless Native American woodcarver. The department issued a scathing report earlier this month accusing Puerto Rico police of a “staggering level of crime and corruption.’’

All told, Justice’s Civil Rights Division is conducting 17 probes of police and sheriff departments — the largest number in its 54-year history. The investigations are civil, meaning they will not lead to criminal charges, but can result in court-enforced reforms.

The federal effort, part of the administration’s heightened enforcement of civil rights laws, has won praise from advocacy groups and experts on police brutality.

“This is long overdue,’’ said Deborah J. Vagins, senior legislative counsel for the ACLU’s Washington legislative office. “The Bush administration beyond dropped the ball. These are some of the most egregious situations, places where we have killings committed by officers.’’
While many localities have welcomed the federal inquiries, others complain they are duplicating the work of civilian review boards, and can end up costing the jurisdictions millions of dollars if monitoring is ordered. Two of the departments under review have resisted, forcing the government to sue to gain access to documents or to interview deputies.

Among those is Maricopa County, Ariz., led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose department is under investigation for allegedly discriminating against Hispanic inmates and motorists.

The sheriff’s office in Alamance County, N.C., is still battling the Justice Department in court and has accused it of having political motives. “We have no idea what the allegations are because they won’t tell us,’’ said Randy Jones, a sheriff’s office spokesman. “They need to be upfront and professional, and we haven’t seen that . . . it seems like they’re trying to find something, and there’s nothing there.’’

Justice officials, who have said they are exploring whether Alamance deputies discriminated against Hispanics, say police investigations are a key part of their effort to revitalize the Civil Rights Division. It had suffered a mass exodus of lawyers amid conclusions by internal watchdogs that hiring was politicized in the Bush administration.
Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights, said the investigations into local police are “really a cornerstone of our work.” He was speaking to reporters about the report on Puerto Rico, which accused officers of widespread brutality, unconstitutional arrests and targeting people of Dominican descent.

That followed a Justice Department report in March that said the New Orleans Police Department repeatedly violated constitutional rights by using excessive force, illegally arresting people and targeting black and gay residents.

“When police officers cross the line, they need to be held accountable,’’ Perez said. “Criminal prosecutions alone will not change the culture of a department.’’

Experts say it is unclear if police brutality is increasing or just more likely to be exposed, though Justice officials say factors such as the economy and weaknesses in the mental health system are leading to more potentially dangerous encounters with civilians.

“There’s no way to measure it,’’ said Samuel Walker, an expert on police accountability at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, who praised the Obama administration’s crackdown as “a simple issue of justice. The victims are almost entirely people of color.’’

The current investigations cite a 1994 federal law that gave the Civil Rights Division the authority to determine whether departments are engaging in a “pattern or practice” of violating constitutional or federal rights. It was enacted after the videotaped beating of black motorist Rodney King by Los Angeles police officers.

The Obama administration also has amped up criminal enforcement. The Civil Rights Division last year filed a record number of criminal cases, 52, against mostly law enforcement officers for allegedly violating constitutional or legal rights “under color of law.’’ There are about 10,000 police departments nationwide.

In the civil probes, lawyers in the division’s Special Litigation Section track potential cases through media reports and by consulting with officers, advocacy groups and citizens. Justice Department officials are focusing on large departments and on securing court-enforced changes to guarantee enduring reforms.

“We can’t go everywhere there is a civil rights violation,’’ said one Justice official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not an authorized spokesman. “There are too many places with problems.’’

Among the most expansive probes is in Newark, where the Justice Department announced in May it is investigating allegations including excessive force and discriminatory policing. The ACLU had called for a probe and issued a report documenting 407 alleged cases of police misconduct.

In Suffolk County, N.Y., investigators are probing whether police failed to respond to 911 calls from Hispanics and other non-English speakers. The probe in Portland, launched in June, focuses on allegations of excessive force, especially against people with mental health issues.

Last month, the department announced it would investigate whether Los Angles County sheriff’s deputies in two cities conspired with housing officials to discriminate against black families with low-income housing vouchers.

Steve Whitmore, a spokesman for the county sheriff’s department, said Justice lawyers did not consult with an independent review board probing similar allegations. He said Sheriff Leroy D. Baca would cooperate, yet questioned whether another investigation is needed “when you have several lawyers of oversight already and budgets are extraordinarily tight.’’

Xochitl Hinojosa, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said the department “strongly supports civilian oversight and internal mechanisms to independently investigate and remedy constitutional violations.’’ She added that in cases “where internal review or civilian oversight has failed to identify and correct a problem, a civil rights investigation may be necessary.”
Robert McNeilly, who was police chief in Pittsburgh during a five-year court-approved monitoring period after a Justice Department probe, said “there is some unnecessary alarm about these investigations.’’

“There is no doubt it was an enormous help because dramatic change happened so quickly,’’ said McNeilly, whose former department was accused of excessive force and other violations and released from monitoring in 2002.

“It changed the culture of the entire organization,’’ he said. “We became more accountable.’’

Friday, October 14, 2011

Mass Genocide Of Mohawk Children By UK Queen And Vatican Uncovered In Canada

Mass Genocide Of Mohawk Children By UK Queen And Vatican Uncovered In Canada

BRANTFORD, ON, CANADA – Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute, a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970.

According to Rev. Kevin Annett, Secretary of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (www.itccs.org), the Mohawk Institute was “set up by the Anglican Church of England in 1832 to imprison and destroy generations of Mohawk children. This very first Indian [First Nations] residential school in Canada lasted until 1970, and, like in most residential schools, more than half of the children imprisoned there never returned. Many of them are buried all around the school.”

Preliminary scanning by ground penetrating radar adjacent to the now closed main building Mohawk Institute has revealed that “between 15-20 feet of soil” was brought in and put over the mass graves just before the Mohawk Institute closed in 1970 in order to camouflage the mass graves of Mohawk Children and avoid prosecution for genocide and crimes against humanity under the Geneva Conventions, the International Criminal Court, and cooperating national courts.

International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) is expected to commence judicial proceedings starting in late October 2011 in Brussels, Belgium and Dublin, Ireland for child genocide crimes against humanity against defendants Elizabeth Windsor, head of state of Canada and head of the Church of England and Pope Joseph Ratzinger, both of whom knowingly participated in the planning and coverup of the child genocide, according to forensic evidence.

The Tribunal sessions were originally to have been held in London, U.K. However, The U.K. government has denied entrance to the Secretary and major jurists and staff of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) without cause.

The discovery of the mass graves of Mohawk children, uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute comes on the heels of videotaped evidence by eyewitness William Coombes, who in Oct. 1964 witnessed Elizabeth Windsor, as Head of State of Canada and Head of the Church of England, visit an aboriginal school in Kamloops, British Columbia, choose 10 young aboriginal children, made them kiss her feet, and allegedly took them from the school for a picnic at a lake.

The 10 aboriginal children were never seen again. Mr. Coombes, who was to give evidence at the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) of Elizabeth Windsor’s child genocide, was murdered in Feb. 2011. Fortunately, Mr. Coombes’ testimony was videotaped before his death and is available for the Tribunal.

Rev. Kevin Annett states that instruments of torture such as a rack for torturing the Mohawk children in ritual torture have been found at the now closed Mohawk Institute. Eyewitnesses from the Mohawk community have stated they witnessed priests in red robes torturing children in ritual torture.

Rev. Annett made these revelations in an exclusive Oct. 7, 2011 interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre. In the interview, Rev. Annett acknowledges the close parallels between the Oct. 1964 personal child genocide and possible ritual killings of 10 aboriginal children by Elizabeth Windsor, Head of State of Canada and Head of the Church of England, and the child genocides occurring during the same period at the Mohawk Institute.

These parallels suggest that Elizabeth Windsor, as Head of State and Head of the Church of England was personally aware of, ordered, and participated in this systematic program of genocide and ritual torture and killings at Church of England residential schools operated by the Church of England and the Vatican.

In his interview, Rev. Annett stated that the mainstream Canadian media, as well as the government of Canada, are maintaining a coverup and media blackout of the discoveries of Mohawk child genocide at the Mohawk Institute.

VIDEO: http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2011/10/12/mass-genocide-of-mohawk-children-by-uk-queen-and-vatican-uncovered-in-canada/

Thursday, October 6, 2011

City of Little Rock Caught Red-Handed Violating Freedom of Information Act

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: As of Oct 10, 2011, The City of Little Rock has finally complied with our lawful requests. I did notice that she STILL insisted to take a peek at my press card.

Ms. Hall (Attorney General's Office),

The City of Little Rock is refusing to comply with my Freedom of Information Request under the guise of placing illegal obstacles in the path of an Arkansas citizen. 

As seen in the included e-mails, I am being required to PHYSICALLY appear before them and present a formal ID card in order for them to comply with my lawful request, this to us, it is a direct violation of the tribal sovereignty of the Houma-Choctaw Nation (recognized by the EAC division of the Ark Dept. of Education 2005). 

This is an obvious attempt to complicate compliance. So, is EVERY person in the whole state required to personally appear and present themselves to the City of Little Rock to obtain legal compliance? I have offered to cover any cost regarding my request. They have refused response and compliance at this time.

I am seeking your office's opinion.

Thank You
Chief Ean Bordeaux, Pro Per
Houma-Choctaw Nation

In response to your request, I have attached a PDF copy of Op. Att’y Gen. 2008-071.  Hopefully, the discussion contained in this opinion will assist you in resolving your questions in this regard.  I call your attention to page 11 of the attached opinion, which cites the implicit FOIA requirement that custodians mail records upon request.  
Cheryl Hall, CLA  
Opinions Department  
Arkansas Attorney General's Office  
323 Center Street, Suite 1100  
Little Rock, AR  72201  
501-682-8162 (fax)

Opinion No. 2008-071 
Page 11 

As a practical matter, therefore, it may be impossible to afford immediate, 
unrestricted access to the requested records.  The question will turn on the specific 
facts of each individual case, but consultation with legal counsel for the purpose of 
“separate[ing] exempt from nonexempt information” may be justified, although a 
delay for this purpose should not exceed three working days.  See Op. Att’y Gen. 

Because the question posed also mentions  the need to view  the records at the 
office of the agency’s attorney, it perhaps bears noting that in accordance with 
A.C.A. § 25-19-105(a)(2)(A) (Supp. 2007), “[a] citizen may make a request to the 
custodian to inspect, copy, or receive copies of public records.”  (Emphasis added).  
This section provides, additionally, that “[t]he request may be made in person, by 
telephone,  by mail, by facsimile transmission,  by electronic mail, or by other 
electronic means provided by the custodian.”   Id. at (B) (emphasis added).  

Although the intent to afford citizens the right to receive copies of records by mail 
is not expressly set forth in the statute, I believe such intent may be fairly implied.  
Accordingly, to the extent your question also suggests some concern that the 
citizen was not able to request that copies of the selected records be provided by 
mail, such concern may in my opinion be warranted.  The question of whether any 
citizen has been denied rights granted  by the FOIA will,  however, ultimately 
depend upon the specific facts.  See generally Op. Att’y Gen. 2000-059. 
Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker prepared the foregoing opinion, 
which I hereby approve. 


26 messages:
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM
To: Willy Dog
Kelly forwarded your email to me for response. I have reviewed your request and my response is that we
do not have a record that meets “Fire Chief’s son”. The Freedom of Information Act refers to
documents/records that we keep and we are not able to produce a document under that title.
Stacey Witherell
Labor and Employee Relations Manager
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 1:09 PM
To: Shepard, Kelly
Subject: Re: FOIA Req.

Can I get the full name, date of hire of Fire Chief Summer's son please?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Willy Dog wrote:

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Shepard, Kelly wrote:
Thank you sir.
Willy Dog Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:22 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
FOI Ammended REQ:
Full and complete available personnel/disciplinary records via email for the
Jamaal Roby-LRFD
Lt. Tanya Washington-LRPD
Sgt. Roger Snooks-LRPD
James Stanchak-LRPD
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:34 PM
To: thastings@littlerock.org
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:39 PM
To: Willy Dog
Just to clarify you want the entire personnel file and whatever disciplinary actions there are that are releasable or
just the disciplinary actions? Just a reminder, only disciplinary actions that are suspensions and terminations
are releasable after final administrative resolution.
Thank you.
Stacey Witherell
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 1:23 PM
To: Witherell, Stacey
Subject: Re: FW: FOIA Req.
FOI Ammended REQ:
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:43 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
You are clear, personnel and releasable. Thank you.
[Quoted text hidden]
Hastings, Terry Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:33 AM
To: Willy Dog
Sorry. I have been in Boston. Off. Howard has been working on this and should have ready soon. Thanks
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 1:34 PM
To: Hastings, Terry
Subject: Fwd: FW: FOIA Req.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Willy Dog
Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: FW: FOIA Req.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:43 PM
To: "Hastings, Terry"
no problem
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:11 AM
To: Willy Dog
I have completed the notification part and no attorney general opinion has been requested. We will not be able to
provide them electronically because we must redact the personal information, i.e., ssn, address, DOB, etc. on a
hard copy. The Department charges $.02 per page for copies.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 1:44 PM
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:59 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
Please remit all pages that do not require redaction electronically. Please remit
quote for the remaining, thank you.
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM
To: Willy Dog
Our imaging system is not that sophisticated were I can print one page and then email another out of the same
bunch of documents automatically.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 12:59 PM
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:03 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
Is your system sophisticated enough to electronically redact using the "Find"
option for each target redaction?
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:04 PM
To: Willy Dog
Nope, nothing of the sort. I am counting the pages now, it doesn’t look that big.
Nope, nothing of the sort. I am counting the pages now, it doesn’t look that big.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:03 PM
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:07 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
very, well. Not so much the amount. it is far more efficient to organize, as you
know, electronically. We will just have to do it here.
I do appreciate your efforts. With the new tax increase, we may have to seriously
look into a more sophisticated and efficient compliance system. Better things to be
doing than collating, hmm.
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:14 PM
To: Willy Dog
$4.54 is the cost. I recommend getting to HR before 4:30 p.m. M-Thursday and before 4:00 p.m. on Fridays so
there is plenty of time to process the payment.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:08 PM
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM
To: Willy Dog
Also, will need to see an ID.
From: Witherell, Stacey
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:15 PM
To: 'Willy Dog'
Subject: RE: FW: FOIA Req.
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:28 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
Thank you, will do.
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:29 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
Why, is it required to have my id on your records?
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
my id is undeniable.
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM
To: Willy Dog
To ensure correct delivery. We don’t just let anyone come and pick up documents without identification.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:30 PM
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
Cc: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov, "Hastings, Terry"
Very well. My correct delivery address should be on file. if not, here it is:
15 Bragg St.
Little Rock, AR 72202
Send certified mail if you like. This should fulfill that requirement, we will stop and
pay you today. If you like, LRPD Lt. Terry Hastings can "ID" me for you as well.
What we won't do is put our "id" on file with a city that we have concerns with OR
allow it to be an obstacle to our lawfully rightful FOIA requests under penalty of
criminal law.
[Quoted text hidden]
Hastings, Terry Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:43 PM
To: Willy Dog
The info she has should have what you need. Let me know if you need anything else.
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:42 PM
To: Witherell, Stacey
Cc: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov; Hastings, Terry
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:46 PM
To: "Hastings, Terry"
Thank you sir for your many years of professionalism as it relates to our lawful
[Quoted text hidden]
Witherell, Stacey Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM
To: Willy Dog
Cc: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov, "Hastings, Terry"
I am not sure what all of this is about, however, before I release these documents we will ensure that we are
releasing the documents to the correct person. I have no idea of what you mean to put your ID on file. We don’t
scan, keep it, copy it, etc. The name has to match the name of the person who made the request. It is that
simple. I am not going to mail the documents because that is a cost to the city and therefore I don’t think I have
to under the Act. If you are aware of something that says I do, please let me know.
Stacey Witherell
From: Willy Dog [mailto:willydog101@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:42 PM
To: Witherell, Stacey
Cc: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov; Hastings, Terry
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM
To: "Hastings, Terry"
Cc: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov, "Witherell, Stacey"
Thank you sir for your many years of professionalism as it relates to our lawful requests.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Hastings, Terry
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM
To: "Witherell, Stacey"
I will cover your mailing costs. It is a matter of principle, my experiences with the
moral fairness of this city is well known. I am also a public figure with my own
corruption blogsite syndicate world-wide, with my picture on it.
http://corruptionsucks.blogspot.com. As I said, I will come down personally and
cover any and all of your lawfully charged compliance fees PRIOR to you sending
my request. My ID can easily be verified without me being compelled to submit my
"papers" to you. That is the big deal maam.
When this city starts treating me, my tribe and business like they do the rest of
their friends, that's when this won't be a big deal. We are not making these
requests to be frivolous, I assure you.
requests to be frivolous, I assure you.
[Quoted text hidden]
Willy Dog Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM
To: CHERYL.Hall@arkansasag.gov, "Hastings, Terry"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Willy Dog
Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: FW: FOIA Req.
[Quoted text hidden]

Philander Smith Recruiter Arrested for Rape & Promoting Sexual Performance By Child

This Scum Bag of a Pedophile was arrested Weds. October 5, 2011


by Ean Lee Bordeaux on Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 2:28pm

2011- 134949 – SEXUAL ASSAULT 2ND DEGREE  
ARREST DATE/TIME – 10-05-2011, 1245 HOURS

On December 08, 2010, Officer Chambers took a report of a sexual assault, which allegedly occurred on the campus of Philander Smith College, involving the Director of Recruiting, Mr. George Gray and a sixteen-year-old female student.  Detectives were assigned to investigate the allegations and during an interview she advised Detectives that she was asked by another student to go to Mr. Gray’s office, located on Philander Smith’s campus.  While in Mr. Gray’s office she was approached by Mr. Gray and asked to dance or strip at a party for his fraternity.  She advised Mr. Gray that she could not do that, at which time Mr. Gray told her in an aggressive tone to pull her pants down.    

She advised that as she started to leave the office, Mr. Gray grabbed her and bent her over a desk and sexually assaulted her.  Detectives interviewed multiple people regarding this incident, and after presenting evidence to the Prosecuting Attorney’s office, warrants were obtained for Mr. Gray.  Officers made contact with Gray at his residence, located at #5 Roswell Court.  Gray was taken into custody and transported to the Detective Division.  Gray was charged with one count Sexual Assault 2nd Degree and Producing, Directing and Promoting a Sexual Performance by a Child.  Gray was transported to the Pulaski County Jail.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

New NIA Stock Suggestion

NIA already owns a large position in its new stock suggestion. We normally don't publicly suggest a stock that we already own a large position in, but this stock is currently trading for well below our purchase price and we consider it to be one of the biggest steals in the market today. Please see our disclaimer at the bottom of this email for information on the amount of shares we own, our purchase price, and when we intend to sell our shares.
Ocean Power Technologies (OPTT)
Currently $2.38
OPTT is currently one of our largest positions and yesterday it declined 12% to a new 52-week low on very low volume. We have been accumulating OPTT for many weeks and would have accumulated even more yesterday if we weren't traveling on flights for the entire day.
OPTT, in our opinion, is the biggest steal and most undervalued stock fundamentally today based on its balance sheet. NIA believes that the stock market in general today is the most undervalued it has ever been in world history. We are aware of countless stocks that we believe are extremely undervalued. However, there is always a chance the market could decline lower and we are focused on investing into companies that we believe will rise substantially in price regardless of what the rest of the market does.
The best way to become wealthy is to buy stocks when the investment community is fearful and sell when they become greedy. Investors today have trillions of dollars on the sidelines and we are seeing a temporary surge in the U.S. dollar with U.S. Treasuries skyrocketing to record highs while yields decline to record lows. This is a temporary phenomenon caused by the Federal Reserve's actions to manipulate long-term interest rates downward. In reality, the Fed's actions will create tremendous monetary inflation and will result in a loss of confidence in the U.S. dollar. The U.S. Treasury dollar bubble is now at a new peak. NIA considers the recent move in Treasuries to be a headfake that will soon reverse and turn into a rapid downward spiral with Treasury prices collapsing and yields rising faster than ever before in history.
NIA believes the safest way to make massive profits in stocks between now and the end of 2011 is to take advantage of the recent temporary short-term U.S. Treasury rally. We have been researching nearly all U.S. stocks with strong balances sheets and analyzing companies trading for below the total combined value of their cash on hand and U.S. Treasury holdings.
OPTT is a company that ended the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 with $20,512,779 in U.S. Treasuries that mature within 3 to 12 months. OPTT also has $7,608,930 in U.S. Treasuries that mature after one year. OPTT also has $3,806,808 in U.S. dollar certificates of deposit, $773,326 in Australian dollarcertificates of deposit, and $10,489,890 in U.S. dollar cash.
OPTT's Treasuries and certificates of deposit are basically just as good as cash, so all together OPTT is now sitting on an enormous amount of cash totaling $43,191,773. OPTT only has a very small amount of debt equaling $500,000. This means OPTT's net cash position equals $42,691,773.
OPTT ended the first quarter with total shares outstanding of 10,394,720. Therefore, OPTT's total net cash position including their Treasuries and CDs is currently worth $4.11 per share. That is 73% above OPTT's current share price of $2.38.
OPTT's decline in recent weeks has been on very low volume and we are very confident this stock will rise soon to back above its net cash position of $4.11 per share. We believe OPTT is down mainly due to a lack of liquidity in the overall market. Very few people are aware of OPTT and how much cash they have. With investors fearful in general right now to own stocks, there is a lack of buying in OPTT. At the same time, we believe those who bought OPTT on margin are being forced to liquidate.
OPTT is a marginable stock and once a marginable stock declines to below $3, the margin requirements change. Instead of needing to maintain equity of 30% to avoid a margin call, when a stock declines below $3 you must then maintain at least $1.50 per share in equity, which at $2.38 per share means one must maintain 63% in equity. This means the equity requirements for OPTT shareholders have more than doubled in the past couple of weeks, which has created forced liquidations in this stock.
Our educated, brilliant, and smart NIA members are always on the hunt for once-in-a-lifetime opportunities and OPTT is certainly one of the biggest opportunities in the market today.

There are many other reasons that we like OPTT besides its balance sheet. A tsunami recently destroyed a large part of Japan and caused one of the largest nuclear disasters in world history. When you think of the strength of the tsunami that struck Japan, think about all of the energy that is contained in the ocean's waves. Now imagine if a company was able to develop technology that can harness energy from the ocean's waves and use that energy to either power people's homes across the world or power devices in the middle of the ocean where no power is available, such as tsunami warning systems or homeland security devices. Energy from the ocean is completely clean with no health dangers like with nuclear.
OPTT has patented PowerBuoy technology that cost effectively harnesses clean energy from the ocean's waves. OPTT has a PowerBuoy called the PB150 that moves up and down in the middle of the ocean as it gets hit by waves and transfers that energy to the power grid on shore. One PB150 can power 150 homes and OPTT is currently developing its next generation PB500 that is scheduled to launch in 2013 and could make OPTT's technology even more cost effective than wind and solar.
OPTT has another type of PowerBuoy that is Autonomous. Right now, if the U.S. Navy wants to power a homeland security device in the middle of the ocean, it must use diesel generators, which need frequent maintenance and fuel replenishment. OPTT's Autonomous PowerBuoys provide continuous power to any type of device located in the middle of the ocean. OPTT recently deployed a brand new Autonomous PowerBuoy for the U.S. Navy's maritime security program. OPTT integrated it with radar network and communications infrastructure for a sophisticated vessel detection and tracking system, enabling maritime surveillance in the near coast, harbors and littoral zones worldwide. OPTT's Autonomous PowerBuoy stores energy so that it works in zero wave conditions and it won't require any maintenance for three years.
OPTT is now collaborating with Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) on a commercial-scale wave power generation project at Reedsport, Oregon. LMT is a $23.7 billion company and with their support we believe OPTT is on track to become one of the world's largest providers of alternative energy! LMT clearly sees huge potential for ocean power technology, but they can't enter the business without working with OPTT because OPTT holds all of the vital patents covering the harnessing of energy from the ocean's waves.
All together OPTT holds 41 patents protecting their technology, with their latest patent covering a PowerBuoy that provides cell phone service in the middle of the ocean where no cell phone towers exist. To see a list of all of OPTT's patents from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's web site, go to:http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&RS=AN%2Focean+AND+AN%2Fpower&Refine=Refine+Search&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=AN%2Focean+AND+AN%2Fpower+AND+AN%2Ftechnologies
We believe OPTT's patents are easily worth a few dollars per share above OPTT's $4.11 per share net cash position. Then when you look at OPTT's actual business that saw revenues grow last quarter by 39% and you also consider how closely OPTT has been working with the U.S. Department of Defense, OPTT's business itself could potentially be worth a few dollars more on top of the value of OPTT's cash and patents. We are calling a bottom right now on OPTT and we will be absolutely shocked if this stock doesn't make massive gains from its current price of $2.38.

Disclaimer: NIA owns 177,000 shares of OPTT that it purchased at an average price of $3.267 per share. NIA intends to sell its shares after OPTT rises back above $3.267 per share.
NIA is not an investment advisor. This email is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. Never make investment decisions based on anything NIA says. This email is meant for informational and educational purposes only and does not provide investment advice. NIA's co-founders have previously disseminated information about OPTT in other media outlets.
Additional legal disclaimer information:http://inflation.us/legaldisclaimer.html

Popular Posts