HOME PAGE (CLICK HERE)





******* READ ABOUT: Little Rock's Newest Corrupt Police Chief Kenton Buckner *******


Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Louisiana Purchase Treaty-A Shattered Creole Treaty

The Louisiana Purchase Treaty, the ramifications.

For all those who are interested in the history of the Creoles of the United States and particularly how Creolism developed in the state of Louisiana, it is imperative to understand how the Louisiana Purchase Treaty came into effect and under what circumstances. The LPT is often said to be a turning point in the history of the Louisiana State and its integration into the United States of America. However, not much attention was given to the people of that state at the time the treaty in that process. A people with a unique history and culture different from the rest of the United States: The Creoles of Louisiana, which was made up of Creole Indians, like the Ancient Houma and Choctaws, Free people of Colour (gens de couleurs libres) as well as "blacks" of African and Haitian origins. No compensation, consideration or respect were given to the right and freedom of these people to continue to enjoy their unique culture, instead followed a period of outright discrimination which caused many Creoles to flee to other parts of the States, to France and even to Mexico as Mary Gehman found out in her research. To understand fully the ramifications of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, I urge you to read carefully and critically the following article by Gilbert E Martin.

Louis G de Lamare

Edited by Chief Elder Ean Lee Bordeaux, pro per
Ancient West Feliciana Parish Houma-Choctaw Tribe


The Louisiana Purchase Treaty
Napoleon’s Justifiable Revenge on the U.S.A
Narrated by
Gilbert E. Martin


It was no secret that Napoleon Bonaparte desired to have a French empire in America. But his ego coupled with his envy of Toussaint L’Ouverture destroyed his dream, and cost France her most profitable colony, and the Louisiana Territory to boot. On April 27, 1803, nine months after his abduction, Toussaint died in a dungeon in the Alps. At that time, two Americans, R. R. Livingston and James Monroe, were in Paris pestering Napoleon to give his final approval of sale of the vast Louisiana Territory. The wily Napoleon, however, was down but not out. He knew that the Americans had supplied the black revolutionaries in St. Domingue (now Haiti), with supplies and ammunition to help break the French power in the Western Hemisphere. Furthermore, the two Americans had mentioned to Napoleon that he didn’t have much choice because, as they put it, the United States was powerful enough to take the territory by force.

With Toussaint’s death on his mind, and pressure coming from Livingston and Monroe, revenge took control of his thoughts, which prompted the great Napoleon Bonaparte to devise his very own Trojan horse. Playing upon American greed, bigotry and ignorance of human innate Intelligence, this man took 70 simple words and concocted what I believe to be one of the most impregnable articles ever to be found in any document pertaining to the rights of a nation of people with lineage to Africa. After toying with the Americans who were extremely anxious to get the treaty signed, Napoleon finally gave his approval. The American representatives hurried their signatures on the document and were off to the United States to brag about closing the biggest real estate deal in history (908,380 square miles) for only $15 million. Nobody bothered to simply pay a little attention to the conditions under which the sale was made. Those conditions can be found in Article III of the LPT, which is the Trojan horse mentioned above. Article III clearly reads as follows:

The inhabitants of the ceded territory shall be incorporated in the Union of the United States, and admitted as soon as possible, according to the principles of the Federal Constitution, to the enjoyment of all the rights, advantages, and immunities, of citizens of the United States; and in the meantime, they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property, and the religion which they profess.

On page 254 of a document entitled The Treaty between the United States of America and the French Republic, there’s an indication of a footnote behind Article III. At the bottom of the page it reads, "Said to have been drawn by Napoleon himself." I located that document in the main Public Library in New Orleans.

Assuming that every educated person in the civilized world has some knowledge of the black man’s plight in the Southern parts of the United States, it can readily be seen that Article III was not an American design. Also, everybody knows that blacks did not benefit from Article III as Napoleon intended. Approximately forty thousand Frenchmen with lineage to Africa were among the "inhabitants" of the "ceded territory." By knowingly depriving us and our posterity of the stipulated benefits, mentioned above, the United States clearly committed a material breach of the LPT. Consequently, we suffered much devastation of our culture, and irreparable damages to the growth and development of our nation.

However, to fully appreciate and understand the ramifications of the breaching of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, and in order to attempt to assess the consequential damages inflicted upon both, our French Creole nation and the United States as well, we need a bit of history. So, we shall begin in St. Domingue (now Haiti) in 1791. From there we shall proceed to Louisiana 1803. In August of that year, prior to the slave uprising, St. Domingue was the richest colony in the Western Hemisphere. Our colony did more business with Europe than all of the thirteen newly formed United States combined. The population of our colony consisted of 32,000 rich white planters, 30,000 rich Mulatto planters (of all shades and colors), and 500,000 thousand slaves, of which the Mulattos held 125,000.

The slaves revolted in August of 1791. Consequently, thousands of our people emigrated to the Louisiana Territory, and settled in and around the city of New Orleans. This was twelve years before Napoleon sold the territory to the Americans. At that time, however, the territory was then a Spanish colony under Spanish government. Grace King described our emigration, which began in 1791, in her 1895 book, New Orleans: The Place and the People. King wrote: "Besides the white and slave immigration from the West Indian Islands, there was a large influx of free gens de couleur into the city, a class of population whose increase by immigration had been sternly legislated against. Flying, however, with the whites from massacre and ruin, humanitarian sentiments induced the authorities to open the city gates to them, and they entered by thousands. Like the white emigres, they brought in the customs and manners of a softer climate, a more luxurious society, and a different civilization…they represented a distinct variety, a variety which their numbers made important, and for a time decisive in its influence on the home of their adoption."

Now, from the above quotation we find that three classes of people fled the turmoil in the West Indies. There hasn’t been any other time in the history of mankind, when whites, thousands of free people of color and African slaves fled en masse from a catastrophic situation. Literally speaking, they were all together in the same boats. Furthermore, prior to the revolution, we had already experienced more than one hundred years of black slavery and black freedom coexisting. As an effort to ameliorate racial conditions in the French colonies, in 1685, Louis XIV promulgated the very first equal rights edict ever written that included people of African lineage. It was called the Code Noir, or the Black Code. The king proclaimed that all free and freed Mulattos and Africans were to be regarded as free citizens of France. That code was written 106 years before the Haitian Revolution of 1791.

Now, at this point, we can take the liberty of using a little common sense. We can assure ourselves that when the Black Code was written, it was not written for a population of free little black or mixed blood babies. There had to be adults to warrant such concern. So, with that in mind, I am saying that black freedom and black slavery coexisted in St. Domingue for at least one hundred and twenty-five years before the Haitian Revolution, and twelve additional years longer, in Louisiana, before the signing of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty. And afterwards, that coexistence lasted for another 62 years until slaves were freed in America. When it all adds up, we have approximately 200 years of black freedom and black slavery coexisting. All of this is important in order to understand the differences in attitudes between the Creoles of Southern Louisiana, those of Northern Louisiana, and African Americans. With so many rich and cultured Creoles (Mulattos and Africans) then it was virtually impossible for the slaves (Mulattos and Africans) to develop an inferiority complex. Even, if black and/or Mulatto slave owners were cruel, as some have asserted, at least they were black or Mulatto, and had their known ancestry rooted in Africa and/or in slavery. Now, with that backdrop we return our attention to Napoleon’s Justifiable Revenge on the United States of America — the LPT.

On top of all of the above, in May of 1791, three months before the Haitian Revolution, news reached St. Domingue that the National Convention in Paris had decreed Mulattos must be allowed to represent themselves by participating in the colony’s government. Moreover, French Creoles from Haiti, Martinique, and Guadeloupe, had served with distinction in Napoleon’s racially integrated armies, in every category from buck privates all the way up to the highest official positions. Therefore, it would be absolutely ludicrous to even hint that Napoleon was the least bit unaware of what the Americans would encounter when making contact with the nonwhites already planted in the ceded territory. Our people, from the highest in society down to the lowly slaves, possessed educational power, moral strength, and more than enough tenacity to endure and resist American racism. Yes! Napoleon knew perfectly well what he was doing when he carefully crafted Article III of the LPT.

Now, enter the Americans. On December 20, 1803, William C. C. Claiborne, Louisiana’s first governor and General James Wilkinson arrived in the colony to take possession of Louisiana for the United States. That was eight months after the treaty was signed. Still the U. S. had not prepared its citizens to accept and comply with Article III of the LPT. In fact, by Claiborne’s first letter to Thomas Jefferson, president of the U. S., one could easily conclude that the Americans had absolutely no intention to comply. I see Claiborne’s letter as evidence that the United States intended to defraud. In his letter, Claiborne said to Jefferson; "My principal difficulty arises from two large companies of people of color, who are attached to the service, and were esteemed a very serviceable corps under the Spaniards. On this particular corps I have reflected with much anxiety." ‘To keep them, said Claiborne, would offend the Union and particularly the rest of the South…’ "outrage the feelings of a part of the Union;" ‘not to recommission the colored troops,’ he said, "would disgust" ‘the Negroes, and’ "be productive to future mischief; while to disband them would be to raise an armed enemy in the heart of the country, and to disarm them would savor too strongly of that desperate system of government which seldom succeeds."

Apparently, as indicated above, Napoleon anticipated the material breach of the LPT. And since the United States committed the material breach, it has forfeited every bit of the limited jurisdiction it would have had over our nation. And legally speaking, according to America’s own law, the United States does not legally own as much as a shovel full of the 908,380 square miles of land that composed the original Louisiana Territory. There you have it as I see it. You have before you, Napoleon's Justifiable Revenge on the United States of America.

Our treaty has seniority over all treaties made with the Indians, excepting those made in the 13 original states before the LPT. However, on this issue, the French Creoles of Louisiana are still asleep. Shame! Shame! Shame!

There's a very simple question here. Is Gilbert E. Martin right or is he wrong? Or, did the United States breach the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, yes or no. I don't believe that the United States Government will ever raise the issue and volunteer the answer to either of those simple questions. Do you?
-->

COMMENTS:
RE: "My question remains, from whom did Napoleon buy the land ? I understand and agree that the Creoles as I am one were treated as second class chattel and or servants. I also agree that the US has no legal claim to the land , but the argument should be based on the fact that Napoleon himself stole the land , then turned around and and soled the land to European genocidal corporate expansionist en slavers who then profited killed and displaced the native Creole nation.What makes the Purchase null and void is the same as buying a stolen car from someone and assuming it is rightfully yours, it isn't and when the true owner of said car find he car he or she has the right to demand the car be returned as the land should be returned to the creole .And those that don't have native ancestry should be removed at the cost of the Occupier US government. This Purchase was based on racism the Indigenous people were the pawns and Napoleon ans the present Occupying US Government have benefited on the grounds of Unjust Enrichment among other things."

Everything you said is true. We are Creole "INDIANS" decedents of the Ancient West Feliciana Houma-Choctaw Tribe, our folk have been here for many hundreds of years. We understand and agree with your essential position. We are also realists, we faithfully acknowledge that Louisiana Creoles have been absolutely essential to our survival in spite of Bonaparte and look solely to the Creole planters that made it possible for us to say what we say today by the inseparable blood-bonds that they have made with us as ancient historic indigenous folk. This is not about a/the dictator, it is about the people that exist beyond that dictator and those to come who have survive. Creole Indians must face their complex heritage head-on and start making a unique future for us all that wish to follow in this journey. Thank you very much for your clear contribution to this discourse, it is rare and appreciated. 

2 comments:

  1. My question remains , from whom did Napoleon buy the land ? I understand and agree that the Creoles as I am one were treated as second class chattel and or servants. I also agree that the US has no legal claim to the land , but the argument should be based on the fact that Napoleon himself stole the land , then turned around and and soled the land to european genocidal corporate expansionist en slavers who then profited killed and displaced the native Creole nation.What makes the Purchase null and void is the same as buying a stolen car from someone and assuming it is rightfully yours, it isn't and when the true owner of said car find he car he or she has the right to demand the car be returned as the land should be returned to the creole .And those that don't have native ancestry should be removed at the cost of the Occupier US government. This Purchase was based on racism the Indigenous people were the pawns and Napoleon ans the present Occupying US Government have benefited on the grounds of Unjust Enrichment among other things.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RE: "My question remains , from whom did Napoleon buy the land ? I understand and agree that the Creoles as I am one were treated as second class chattel and or servants. I also agree that the US has no legal claim to the land , but the argument should be based on the fact that Napoleon himself stole the land , then turned around and and soled the land to european genocidal corporate expansionist en slavers who then profited killed and displaced the native Creole nation.What makes the Purchase null and void is the same as buying a stolen car from someone and assuming it is rightfully yours, it isn't and when the true owner of said car find he car he or she has the right to demand the car be returned as the land should be returned to the creole .And those that don't have native ancestry should be removed at the cost of the Occupier US government. This Purchase was based on racism the Indigenous people were the pawns and Napoleon ans the present Occupying US Government have benefited on the grounds of Unjust Enrichment among other things."

    Everything you said is true. We are Creole INDIANS decedents of the Houma-Choctaws our folk have been here for many hundreds of years. We understand and agree with your position. We are also realists, we acknowledged that Creoles have been essential to our survival in spite of Bonaparte and look solely to the Creole planters that made it possible for us to say what we say today. This is not about the dictator, it is about the people that exist beyond that dictator and those to come. Creole Indians must face their complex heritage head-on and start making a unique future for us all that wish to follow in this journey. Thank you very much for your clear contribution to this discourse, it is rare and appreciated.

    ReplyDelete

You are welcome to email your tips, corrections and/or comments to: fraud101@gmail.com please indicate if you wish to remain anonymous or otherwise. We will post your comment without edit.

Most Popular Posts On Corruption Sucks Blog